Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could not be shown:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

b(a(a(x1))) → a(b(c(x1)))
c(a(x1)) → a(c(x1))
b(c(a(x1))) → a(b(c(x1)))
c(b(x1)) → d(x1)
d(x1) → b(a(x1))
a(d(x1)) → d(a(x1))
a(a(x1)) → a(b(a(x1)))

Q is empty.


QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

b(a(a(x1))) → a(b(c(x1)))
c(a(x1)) → a(c(x1))
b(c(a(x1))) → a(b(c(x1)))
c(b(x1)) → d(x1)
d(x1) → b(a(x1))
a(d(x1)) → d(a(x1))
a(a(x1)) → a(b(a(x1)))

Q is empty.

Using Dependency Pairs [1,15] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

D(x1) → A(x1)
A(d(x1)) → A(x1)
C(a(x1)) → C(x1)
D(x1) → B(a(x1))
A(a(x1)) → A(b(a(x1)))
A(d(x1)) → D(a(x1))
B(c(a(x1))) → A(b(c(x1)))
A(a(x1)) → B(a(x1))
C(b(x1)) → D(x1)
B(a(a(x1))) → B(c(x1))
B(a(a(x1))) → C(x1)
B(a(a(x1))) → A(b(c(x1)))
B(c(a(x1))) → B(c(x1))
B(c(a(x1))) → C(x1)
C(a(x1)) → A(c(x1))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

b(a(a(x1))) → a(b(c(x1)))
c(a(x1)) → a(c(x1))
b(c(a(x1))) → a(b(c(x1)))
c(b(x1)) → d(x1)
d(x1) → b(a(x1))
a(d(x1)) → d(a(x1))
a(a(x1)) → a(b(a(x1)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
QDP
      ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

D(x1) → A(x1)
A(d(x1)) → A(x1)
C(a(x1)) → C(x1)
D(x1) → B(a(x1))
A(a(x1)) → A(b(a(x1)))
A(d(x1)) → D(a(x1))
B(c(a(x1))) → A(b(c(x1)))
A(a(x1)) → B(a(x1))
C(b(x1)) → D(x1)
B(a(a(x1))) → B(c(x1))
B(a(a(x1))) → C(x1)
B(a(a(x1))) → A(b(c(x1)))
B(c(a(x1))) → B(c(x1))
B(c(a(x1))) → C(x1)
C(a(x1)) → A(c(x1))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

b(a(a(x1))) → a(b(c(x1)))
c(a(x1)) → a(c(x1))
b(c(a(x1))) → a(b(c(x1)))
c(b(x1)) → d(x1)
d(x1) → b(a(x1))
a(d(x1)) → d(a(x1))
a(a(x1)) → a(b(a(x1)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


A(d(x1)) → A(x1)
C(a(x1)) → C(x1)
A(a(x1)) → B(a(x1))
C(b(x1)) → D(x1)
B(a(a(x1))) → B(c(x1))
B(a(a(x1))) → C(x1)
B(c(a(x1))) → B(c(x1))
B(c(a(x1))) → C(x1)
C(a(x1)) → A(c(x1))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

D(x1) → A(x1)
D(x1) → B(a(x1))
A(a(x1)) → A(b(a(x1)))
A(d(x1)) → D(a(x1))
B(c(a(x1))) → A(b(c(x1)))
B(a(a(x1))) → A(b(c(x1)))
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(C(x1)) = 2 + (2)x_1   
POL(c(x1)) = 2 + (4)x_1   
POL(D(x1)) = 1 + (2)x_1   
POL(B(x1)) = (1/2)x_1   
POL(a(x1)) = 2 + (4)x_1   
POL(A(x1)) = 1 + (2)x_1   
POL(d(x1)) = 2 + (4)x_1   
POL(b(x1)) = x_1   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

c(a(x1)) → a(c(x1))
c(b(x1)) → d(x1)
d(x1) → b(a(x1))
b(a(a(x1))) → a(b(c(x1)))
b(c(a(x1))) → a(b(c(x1)))
a(d(x1)) → d(a(x1))
a(a(x1)) → a(b(a(x1)))



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ QDPOrderProof
QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

D(x1) → A(x1)
D(x1) → B(a(x1))
A(d(x1)) → D(a(x1))
A(a(x1)) → A(b(a(x1)))
B(a(a(x1))) → A(b(c(x1)))
B(c(a(x1))) → A(b(c(x1)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

b(a(a(x1))) → a(b(c(x1)))
c(a(x1)) → a(c(x1))
b(c(a(x1))) → a(b(c(x1)))
c(b(x1)) → d(x1)
d(x1) → b(a(x1))
a(d(x1)) → d(a(x1))
a(a(x1)) → a(b(a(x1)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ QDPOrderProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

D(x1) → A(x1)
D(x1) → B(a(x1))
A(a(x1)) → A(b(a(x1)))
A(d(x1)) → D(a(x1))
B(a(a(x1))) → A(b(c(x1)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

b(a(a(x1))) → a(b(c(x1)))
c(a(x1)) → a(c(x1))
b(c(a(x1))) → a(b(c(x1)))
c(b(x1)) → d(x1)
d(x1) → b(a(x1))
a(d(x1)) → d(a(x1))
a(a(x1)) → a(b(a(x1)))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.